A travel price cannot be called transparent when the app quietly chooses extra charges for the traveller.

In July 2026, the US Federal Trade Commission said the companies operating the Hopper travel apps agreed to pay US$35 million to settle allegations that they charged users fees without consent and misrepresented total prices and benefits for some products. The FTC’s case page says the agreement also bars the companies from deceiving consumers about fees.

The complaint alleged that Hopper promised no hidden fees while charging “Tip” and VIP Support fees that it described as optional but presented as pre-selected. It also covered claims about Price Freeze and VIP Support. A stipulated settlement is not a trial verdict, but it identifies the checkout pattern regulators challenged and the changes they sought.

Optional has to mean optional

The small print is not the important part of an optional charge. The important part is whether the customer sees it, understands it and actively chooses it before paying. A pre-selected fee moves the decision from the traveller to the interface designer.

On a booking app, pause before the final payment screen and review every fee line. Take a screenshot of the price claim and the checkout breakdown if they do not match. Travel plans change quickly; records of the original fare, add-ons and refund conditions make it easier to contest a charge or compare a replacement booking.

Sources & further reading

  1. US Federal Trade CommissionFTC v. Hopper (USA), Inc. case summary

Sources establish the reported facts above. Analysis and conclusions are enshit.club’s own.